EcoFoG

 

Hydromorphy preference groups

Data

TaxonLow landHydromorphyPinotièreObservations
Jessenia bataua (Arecaceae)Positive impact of low land on abundanceUnclear positive impact of hydromorphy on abundanceUndetermined 
Oxandra asbeckii (Annonaceae)Negative impact of low land on abundanceNegative impact of hydromorphy on abundanceUndeterminedPas de relation d'allométrie
Sagotia racemosa (Euphorbiaceae)Negative impact of low land on abundanceNo impactUndeterminedPas de relation d'allométrie
Swartzia polyphylla (Caesalpiniaceae)No impactNo impactNo impact 
Symphonia sp. (Clusiaceae)Negative impact of low land on abundanceNegative impact of hydromorphy on abundanceUndetermined 
Gustavia hexapetala (Lecythidaceae)UndeterminedUndeterminedUndetermined 
Iryanthera hostmanni (Myristicaceae)Positive impact of low land on abundancePositive impact of hydromorphy on abundanceUndetermined 
Simaba cedron (Simaroubaceae)No impactPositive impact of hydromorphy on abundanceUndetermined 
Sloanea guianensis (Elaeocarpaceae)Negative impact of low land on abundanceUnclear negative impact of hydromorphy on abundanceUndetermined 
Apeiba petoumo (Tiliaceae)UndeterminedUndeterminedUndetermineddéfini par Collinet sous le nom : Apeiba echinata
1234

Contents

Tree preferences for lowland, hydromorphy or pinotière (Euterpe oleacera stand), defined by 6 criteria:

  • (0) : undetermined impact.
  • (1) : negative impact.
  • (2) : negative impact, not systematic or different among sites.
  • (3) : no impact.
  • (4) : positive impact, not systematic or different among sites.
  • (5) : positive impact.

Anonymous visitor

Envoyer un message
Last update on 2/28/2011